tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-229616072187725718.post6253363465662794459..comments2024-03-11T05:26:34.143-05:00Comments on Women Who Serve: Karatantcheva makes her way backDianehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07124489754017593105noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-229616072187725718.post-85782994363245535182008-01-20T21:50:00.000-06:002008-01-20T21:50:00.000-06:00I say "so-called" because they are enforced capric...I say "so-called" because they are enforced capriciously, and because I think they are also suspect. Consider what was done to poor Kuznetsova, and then consider how flimsy the evidence against Karatantcheva was, and how few rights she was given. <BR/><BR/>As for the rules themselves, I think they are unfair, also, as I have indicated in the past when discussing the Hingis case. <BR/><BR/>So by "so-called" rules, I do not mean that the rules do not exist, but that, in my opinion, they can hardly be called "rules."Dianehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07124489754017593105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-229616072187725718.post-35155556839038979942008-01-20T20:39:00.000-06:002008-01-20T20:39:00.000-06:00Question: what do you mean by the "so-called dopin...Question: what do you mean by the "so-called doping rules"? Are they not rules? It would make sense for you to defend how she was not doping than to attack the existence of the rules. just saying.<BR/>tennischick<BR/>the-original-tennischick.blogspot.comtennischickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14542967574561107186noreply@blogger.com